 |
|
|
| Runtime: 115 min Audio: Dual Audio Language: English Frame Rate: 29.9 fps Video Audio Bitrate: 256 kbps | Starring: Jesse Eisenberg, Common, Mark Ruffalo Year: 2013 Genre: Crime, Mystery, Thriller Director: Louis Leterrier |
Review: BLI? Teenagers. Why? E the more visible, so that you will simply?? Teenagers to be fooled ... not only distributors to see me use? Ijte this piece attachment dialog slogan for the film, but Exhibitors will also be used? trick live international audience dipped into their pockets and spend time with this very disappointing and uninteresting jump movie. Now you see me follow the story of four wizards, known as the Four Horsemen to attract world with magic, close unexplained bank loupe? Before e reward its viewers pa , znivce with the money that was taken. Only a fraud is going on here is hypnotized very interesting trailer, just to make? El robbed himself sat in disbelief? E you pay to see a movie that is so unique and complex , a snap card game! In addition to a sensational set of Jesse Eisenberg, Mark Ruffalo, Woody Harrelson, M? Lanie Laurent, Isla Fisher, Dave Franco, Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman, they fail to properly assemble. They satisfactory performance, but not given oppor? Staff functions to develop as he? Can see how he does in previous roles. It is caused by? E re? Isere Louis Leterrier, along with the writers try to pull it arrive?? many rabbits out of the hat at once, so instead of one rabbit at a time, instead we see a ton ú? temporary actors to be undervalued and limited , showcasing his talent. Sentences? Ina strange, four riders (Eisenberg, Fisher, and Franco Harrelson) are even given surprisingly little screen time after his introduction as thirty minutes of the film begins.In admit? E Now you see me here remain consistent . Sometimes unintriguing it. Movies mentioned slogan along with unsubtle tips scattered? Foregone around dubious about the illusory concept of misdirection, completely ruin any surprises and twists that offer thrilling film. With this film leaves little to be detected during the climax? Cated, one would think, when? Time is actually unnecessary to explain in? plot all the points that it? guess, and calls on the new folder? ek story that remain do not fight? women and / or illogical extent to which it is explained? thee film about magic / illusion, not to believe? e some of the tricks that have been made. Illusion Cinema is not magic and illusion una? Winning the e Me.Now at MU? Can see me compare student who believes? E they are cool newcomer on campus, which , bavnÄ›j? teenagers, one person, â € in poor feeling of self intelligence to cause them to continue to contribute to seminars and despite the fact? e never respond to the? 'E you need. Well, actually, I see now? E you need to be told by their peers (say,? E it is? Thee)? E's not nearly as intellectually talented, cool, funny or unique, so? e pretending? e is. You definitely will not miss anything if you decide to take on a dull, generic and awkward? Film in poor, who constitute a comprehensive and sophisticated piece surface.When my first? Lenka in my mind for now , left his place in the cinema to see me, I actually wanted the film were sold out, so? e I could get home to watch Presti? (2006), or see the Man of Steel (2013), again largely reflects my attitude to unsatisfactory Leterrier film. I added? There is nothing necessarily obvious hatred on Now you see me? welcome e is part of a big one. Now you see me really memorable time 115 minutes thief, and when? I now saw, I would prefer to instead miss dr? et the illusion? e it is actually slo? dioxide story, instead sel abusive? E.
No comments:
Post a Comment